Juan Pablo Paz vs Dan Alexandru Tomescu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L L W L L
Form
W L W W L W W W L LHead-2-Head: Paz 4 - 1 Tomescu
They have played 11 sets in total, with Paz winning 8 and Tomescu winning 3. The last match between Paz and Tomescu was at the M15 Constanta, 09-09-2023, Semifinals, Clay with Juan Pablo Paz getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Juan Pablo Paz | 4 |
| Dan Alexandru Tomescu | 1 |
M15 Constanta(09-09-2023)
7
6
6
3
| Paz | Stats | Tomescu |
|---|---|---|
| 36% (4-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-1) |
| 4 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 602 | Ranking | 551 |
| 284 | Highest Rank | 451 |
| 30 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 3 |
| 59% (484-342) | Career Total W/L | 59% (244-172) |
| $2,105 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 4 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats 
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 5-7 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
59%
(
66 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| 6-1 4-0 ret. |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve %
51%
(
18 of
35)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
8 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
43
Total Points Won
17
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 61 | Games Won | 47 |
| 20 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:57:12 | Average Match Time | 1:57:12 |
| 56% (184/326) | 1st Serve % | 62% (199/322) |
| 72% (132/184) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (129/199) |
| 53% (75/142) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (58/123) |
| 50% (19/38) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (12/32) |
| 42% (135/322) | Return Points Win % | 37% (119/326) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Juan Pablo Paz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
1 of
1)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
6
Total Points Won
2
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Younes Lalami Laaroussi
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
79%
(
68 of
86)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
78
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 0-6 7-6(13) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Noah Perfetti
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Josip Simundza
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
21 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Gokberk Saritas
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Dan Alexandru Tomescu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
34%
(
15 of
44)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
9 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
47
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Manuel Mazza
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Fedor Sosedkin
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Petr Nesterov
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Manuel Mazza
Player
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Facundo Juarez
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
47%
(
45 of
96)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
61%
(
27 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martin Van Der Meerschen
Player
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
75%
(
84 of
112)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
59 of
84)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
38 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
112
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(2) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (484/342) | Win/Loss | 59% (244/172) |
| 58% (1058/778) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (547/395) |
| 54% (8885/7645) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4754/4018) |
| 43% (13/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 38% (14/23) |
| 60% (471/320) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (229/147) |
| 0% (0/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1577 | Aces Total | 686 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1411 | Total Double Faults | 636 |
| 1:16:56 | Average Match Time | 1:15:57 |
| 234.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 422.36 |
| 62% (23809/38609) | 1st Serve % | 62% (12054/19594) |
| 67% (15930/23809) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (8042/12054) |
| 50% (7452/14797) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3799/7540) |
| 46% (2042/4464) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (965/2205) |
| 42% (16606/39152) | Return Points Win % | 42% (8415/19985) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (76/80) | Challenger W/L | 42% (8/11) |
| 61% (407/259) | Futures W/L | 59% (236/161) |
| 59% (469/801) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (241/412) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (87/173) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (49/104) |
| 50% (101/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (51/112) |
| 88% (498/438) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (258/216) |
| 12% (498/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (258/42) |
| 14% (328/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (158/27) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
